How reliable is carbon 14 dating

One of the impressive points Whitewall makes is the conspicuous absence of dates between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago illustrating a great catastrophe killing off plant and animal life world wide (the flood of Noah)!I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay rate.This skews the 'real' answer to a much younger age.We believe all the dates over 5,000 years are really compressible into the next 2,000 years back to creation.So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.You can find some further good information here: -- read the full page if you get the chance.At least to the uninitiated, carbon dating is generally assumed to be a sure-fire way to predict the age of any organism that once lived on our planet.

The methodology is quite accurate, but dendrochronology supposedly shows that the C14 dates go off because of changes in the equilibrium over time, and that the older the dates the larger the error.

After all, this what the archeologist guessed in their published books.

Some believe trees are known to be as old as 9,000 years. A lot of people doubt this claim for various good reasons I wont go into here.

Example: wood found in a grave of known age by historically reliable documents is the standard for that time for the C14 content.

This standard content of C14 can then be used for wood not associated with a historically documented date.

Search for how reliable is carbon 14 dating:

how reliable is carbon 14 dating-48

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “how reliable is carbon 14 dating”